ILLUSTRATIVE · NASA / SVS · NOT ADITYA-L1 DATA
Adjudication record
Engineering provenance
Six times, execution falsified the written specification. Each was measured, adjudicated, and folded into a versioned contract. Nothing here is summarised — every ruling below is the text the owner actually wrote.
What is this?
The engineering record: every time the implementation contradicted the written specification, and how each was ruled on.
Why should I trust it?
Each ruling is reproduced as its author wrote it, parsed from the committed adjudication files. The declined amendment and the clause that remains open are published alongside the closed ones.
Where can I verify it?
- The scientific validationA different surface, a different question
- Reproducibility metricsValidation coverage
- Evidence traceabilityClaim → artifact → commit
- The raw payloadsOne JSON per contradiction
- Contradictions
- 6
- Resolved
- 5
- Still open
- 1
Contract at r6. An open question is shown as open; it is not resolved by going unpublished.
The record
- CONTRADICTION-001Closed→ spec r1
Frozen contract rule F-09 rejects valid archive data
Implementation proved a frozen-contract rule impossible to satisfy. RESOLVED by spec r1.
artifacts/v2/phase05/CONTRADICTION-001.md
- CONTRADICTION-002Closed→ spec r2
§2.1's missing-value clause is factually false
Contract §2.1 missing-value clause falsified by the real archive. RESOLVED by spec r2.
artifacts/v2/phase05/CONTRADICTION-002.md
- CONTRADICTION-003Open· contains a declined amendment
§7's spectrum-integrity tolerance is falsified
Contract §7 spectrum-integrity rule falsified by the real archive.
artifacts/v2/phase05/CONTRADICTION-003.md
- CONTRADICTION-004Closed→ spec r4· contains a declined amendment
two HEL1OS parser-level rules are falsified
Two §2.x parser-level rules falsified by real HEL1OS data. RESOLVED by spec r4.
artifacts/v2/phase05/CONTRADICTION-004.md
- CONTRADICTION-005Closed→ spec r5· contains a declined amendment
the archive-wide build falsifies three frozen rules
Archive-wide build falsified three frozen rules. RESOLVED by spec r5.
artifacts/v2/phase05/CONTRADICTION-005.md
- CONTRADICTION-006Closed
two §2.8 HK checks falsified by the archive-wide rebuild
r5 rebuild surfaced two more §2.8 HK checks. RESOLVED: Defect A implementation-only fix approved; Defect B not approved (working as designed).
artifacts/v2/phase05/CONTRADICTION-006.md
Contract evolution
Each revision was forced by a specific falsification. The contract did not drift; it was amended, on the record, with a reason.
r1
CONTRADICTION-001
r2
CONTRADICTION-002
r3
No contradiction recorded against this revision.
r4
CONTRADICTION-004
r5
CONTRADICTION-005
r6
No contradiction recorded against this revision.